Perceptual Robustness of the Tonal Center of Gravity for Contour Classification

8. Acknowledgments: This work was supported by NSF Grants #BCS-0643134, #BCS 0643054 and #BCS 0643019. 7. References (1) Arvaniti, A.D., Ladd, D. R. & I. Mennen. (1998). Stability of tonal alignment: the case of Greek prenuclear accents. Journal of Phonetics 26: 3-25. (2) Barnes, J., Veilleux, N., Brugos, A. & S. Shattuck-Hufnagel. (Forthcoming). Turning points, tonal targets, and the English Lphrase accent. Language and Cognitive Processes. (3) Bregman, A. S. (1994). Auditory scene analysis: the perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. (4) del Guidice, A., Shosted, R. K., Davidson, K., Salihie, M. & A. Arvaniti. (2007). Comparing methods for locating pitch “elbows.” Proceedings of ICPhS XVI, 1117-1120. (5) D’Imperio, M. (2000). The role of perception in defining tonal targets and their alignment. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University. (6) Knight, R. (2003). Peaks and plateaux: the production and perception of high intonational targets in English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge. (7) Ladd, D.R. (1996/2008). Intonational phonology. New York: Cambridge University Press. (8) Niebuhr, O. (2007). The signalling of German rising-falling intonation categories – the interplay of synchronization, shape, and height. Phonetica 64, 174-193. (9) Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonetics and phonology of English intonation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. (10) Pierrehumbert, J. & S. Steele. (1989). Categories of tonal alignment in English. Phonetica 46: 181-196. (11) Ward, G. & J. Hirschberg. (1985). Implicating uncertainty: the pragmatics of fall-rise intonation. Language 61(4): 747-776. (12) Welby, P. (2003). The slaying of Lady Mondegreen, being a study of French tonal association and alignment and their role in speech segmentation. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University. 3. Corpus